EmploymentUpdates and News

MAY 2006

JUDICIAL UPDATES

Ninth Circuit Upholds Appearance and Grooming Standards as Nondiscriminatory

In Jespersen v. Harrah’s Operating Co., the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed circuit law concerning personal grooming standards in the context of discrimination claims. The federal appellate court clarified the evolving law of “sex stereotyping” claims, holding that the casino’s requirement that female employees wear some makeup, while male employees were forbidden to wear makeup, did not impose an unequal burden on female employees. With respect to sex stereotyping, the court held that appearance standards, including makeup requirements, “may well be the subject of a Title VII claim for sexual stereotyping,” but there must be some evidence that the challenged policy is part of some company policy motivated by sex stereotyping.

NEXT: Employer Is Liable for Injuries Resulting from Employee’s Implied Permissive Use of Company Car

 

 

Inside:
California Legislative Update
Sexual Banter in Workplace Does Not Always Support a Harassment Claim
IWC Did Not Have Authority to Issue Order Exempting Employer from Providing Second Meal Break Based on Collective Bargaining Agreement
Primary Employer Was Properly Cited by Cal-OSHA for Failing to Provide for Safety of Employee Leased to Secondary Employer
Ninth Circuit Upholds Appearance and Grooming Standards as Nondiscriminatory
Employer Is Liable for Injuries Resulting from Employee’s Implied Permissive Use of Company Car
Valid Forum Selection and Choice of Law Provisions in Employment Agreement Can Require Employee to Litigate FEHA Claims in Other State

 

 


Home | About | News | Practice Areas | Profiles | Careers | Clients | Locations | Privacy | Contact

Copyright 1998-2008 KLINEDINST PC. All rights reserved.