EmploymentUpdates and News

SEPTEMBER 2005

II. JUDICIAL UPDATE


California Supreme Court Expands Retaliation Liability

In Yanowitz v. L’Oreal USA, Inc., Elyse Yanowitz (“the Employee”) was instructed by her supervisor to fire an unattractive female sales employee and replace her with someone “hot.” Although the Employee asked her supervisor to provide a justifiable reason to fire the employee, she never said that she thought the act would be unlawful discrimination. The Employee did not comply with the instruction. Thereafter the Employee’s performance, previously highly rated, came under severe scrutiny and criticism. She eventually took a leave of absence for stress and never returned to work.

The Court held that the Employee need not specifically complain about unlawful discrimination. The Employee’s reasonable belief that her manager’s demands were discriminatory and her demand for a justifiable reason to fire the employee were sufficient notice to her manager. The heightened scrutiny of the Employee’s performance, accompanied by both public and private criticism, materially altered her employment conditions, thereby creating a valid claim for retaliation.

 

NEXT: Vacation Deductions for Exempt Employees

 

 

Inside:
California Legislation
Officers and Directors Not Liable for Unpaid Overtime Compensation
California Supreme Court Expands Retaliation Liability
Vacation Deductions for Exempt Employees
Non-Sexual Conduct Sufficient to State a Claim

 

 

 

 

 

Want to Automatically Receive These Monthly Employment Updates?

 

 

 


Home | About | News | Practice Areas | Profiles | Careers | Clients | Locations | Privacy | Contact

Copyright 1998-2008 KLINEDINST PC. All rights reserved.