![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
JANUARY 2004 I. LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY
UPDATE President Bush has proposed an immigration reform measure that would provide temporary legal status to millions of undocumented immigrant workers in the United States. If approved by Congress, the plan would allow workers currently in the country illegally to pay a fee and register in a temporary worker program if they can prove that they are currently employed in the United States. It would also permit foreigners to come to the United States as “temporary workers” if they have a job offer from an employer who demonstrates that no U.S. worker could be found for the job. Such temporary worker status would last three years and could be renewed for an additional three years. It is anticipated that the President Bush’s proposal will generate much debate in Congress. Many modifications to the proposed law will be considered.
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has imposed a March 1 deadline upon the California legislature to pass significant workers’ compensation insurance reform, aimed at drastically reducing workers’ compensation insurance costs. Claiming that the tremendous increases employers have seen in their workers’ compensation insurance premiums during the past several years has driven businesses and jobs out of the state, Schwarzenegger has threatened that if such legislation is not enacted by March 1st, he will ensure that a workers’ compensation reform will be placed before the voters on the November ballot.
Gender Harassment (AB 196): Permits employees to appear or dress consistently with their “gender identity,” so long as they adhere to reasonable workplace appearance and grooming standards which conform with state and federal law. The new law, which is codified in California Government Code sections 12926 and 12949, defines “gender” as the employee’s “actual sex” or the employer’s perception of the employee’s sex, and includes the employer’s perception of the employee’s identity, appearance, or behavior, regardless of whether that identity, appearance, or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with the employee’s sex at birth. AB 196 therefore makes it illegal to discriminate (for example) against a male worker or job applicant because he appears feminine, whether in clothing, hairstyle, make-up, grooming, speech, personality, mannerisms, or demeanor if he “identifies” with being a female. Sexual Harassment (AB 76): AB 76, which amends California Government Code section 12940(j), provides that, under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, an employer will be liable for failing to take immediate or appropriate corrective action to prevent harassment of an employee by vendors, customers and clients of the employer, once the employer knows or should reasonably know of the harassment. The employer’s liability in such instances, however, may be limited depending upon how much control the employer can exert over the harassing non-employee. It should be noted that federal law has long held that employers may be held liable for harassment by non-employees.
The following payroll tax rates will be
utilized during 2004:
II. JUDICIAL UPDATE
In Hayut v. State University, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that a New York college professor could be held liable for sexual harassment after he repeatedly called a student “Monica” in reference to Monica Lewinsky. Professor Alex Young of the State University of New York at New Paltz repeatedly called one of his students “Monica” in front of other students and professors. On several occasions he asked her about her “weekend with Bill” and occasionally attempted to silence her in class by saying “Be quiet, Monica.” And “I will give you a cigar later.” The Second Circuit held that the student could proceed in her sexual harassment claims under federal law because “a reasonable jury could find the Monica statements were more than mere joking comments or occasional vulgar banter, but was sexually charged and designed by Young to convey certain images about [the student].” This case underscores the fact that verbal comments do not necessarily need to be sexual in nature to constitute harassment under Title VII. The fact that the comments were based upon the student’s gender is enough to sustain a sexual harassment/gender discrimination claim.
If you would like to discuss these or any
other employment law matters, please do not hesitate to contact any member
of Klinedinst's Employment Law
Department.
|
Want to Automatically Receive These Monthly Employment Updates? |
||